Q-CLUSTER-ICM-PRESSURE-SUPPORT · researcher_approved_split
How much do turbulence, bulk motions, shocks, and other non-thermal components violate hydrostatic support and bias cluster masses?
Scope
In scope
Cluster-ICM non-thermal pressure fraction, merger-driven dynamics, hydrostatic mass bias, and comparison with lensing/dynamical masses.
Out of scope
Excludes results centered on galaxy-CGM depletion or early-type-galaxy L_X--T evolution, and cluster-member statistics without an ICM hot-gas constraint.
Why it matters
Explicitly connects ICM thermodynamic structure to pressure support, gas inventories, and systematics in cluster mass inference.
Competing explanations
- Turbulence, bulk motions, and merger shocks dominate non-thermal support, making HSE bias strongly dynamical-state- and radius-dependent
- Cosmic-ray or magnetic pressure contributes comparably to gas motions
- Residual motions are small in relaxed massive clusters, leaving HSE masses biased by less than about 10%
Discriminating observables
- XRISM/Athena line widths and bulk velocities
- HSE-to-lensing/dynamical mass ratio
- Entropy/pressure maps and shock diagnostics in disturbed clusters
- Comparison of tSZ and X-ray pressure profiles
Blockers
- Background, calibration, and projection
- Multitemperature ICM and hydrostatic assumptions
- Merger stage, geometry, and mass calibration